Hospitalization charges1 related to COVID have dropped from a excessive of 132,500 Americans on January 6, 2021, to 71,500 on February 12, 2021. The U.S. had 920,000 staffed hospital beds in 2019,2 of which 14.4% harbored a COVID case in January 2021, and seven.8% achieve this far in February 2021.
This super drop was predicted. Every hospitalized affected person is examined for COVID, usually repeatedly, utilizing PCR tests with excessive false optimistic charges. False positives are due in appreciable half to exorbitant cycle thresholds. This refers back to the most quantity of doublings which can be allowed throughout the take a look at.
The downside brought on by extreme cycle thresholds was properly described in an August 2020 New York Times article,3 however has in any other case been ignored by the mass media. Dr. Sin Hang Lee, director of Connecticut-based Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, challenged4 the FDA’s reliance on exorbitant cycle thresholds in its acceptance of efficacy claims for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine in early December 2020. He and FDA stay engaged on this debate.
The WHO instructed PCR take a look at customers and producers on December 14, 2020,5 and once more on January 20, 2021,6 that PCR cycle thresholds wanted to come back down. The December 14 steering said WHO’s concern relating to “an elevated risk for false SARS-CoV-2 results” and pointed to “background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold value result being [incorrectly] interpreted as a positive result.”
The first instruction7 has been outmoded by the second, which moreover advises on scientific use of the take a look at:8 If the “test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested …”
While this means that the take a look at ought to solely be carried out in these with signs, and its outcomes ought to be interpreted with the scientific context in thoughts, most PCR exams within the U.S. are used very in another way: to display screen asymptomatics at work, at schools and universities and to allow border crossings.
No Caution Is Applied to the Results
One single optimistic take a look at defines somebody as a COVID case. Yet, it’s well-known,9 and was acknowledged in WHO’s January 2021 steering, that screening in low COVID prevalence conditions, reminiscent of within the screening of asymptomatics, will increase the chance of false positives.
And, the chance will increase because the prevalence of illness drops, such that in conditions of low illness prevalence, it’s common to seek out that almost all positives are literally false positives. For instance, see this [referenced] BMJ chart after which the real-life instance within the remark beneath it.10
Everyone within the area knew that the PCR take a look at outcomes have been bogus. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted11 in July 2020 that cycle thresholds above 35 weren’t measuring virus, and moreover that virus couldn’t be cultured from samples that required a excessive quantity of cycles to indicate positivity.
But the drumbeat from the Coronavirus Task Force12 and a few teachers13 and others14 was “test all, test often” — regardless of the inordinate numbers of false positives and negatives. Congress repeatedly15 allotted16 many billions of {dollars} for testing (usually free for the individual being examined) and so testing shortly mushroomed.
Nearly 2 million COVID exams a day17 have been recorded within the U.S. between November 20, 2020, and January 19, 2021. Most of these have been PCR exams that, regardless of their issues, are nonetheless thought of essentially the most correct. Most of the remaining exams carried out have been fast antigen exams. These exams too undergo from excessive false optimistic charges, because the FDA warned in November 2020.18
While every day deaths have solely dropped about 15% since January 12, 2021, there have been dramatic drops throughout the month in new instances19 (down 60% from 250,000 new instances a day to 100,000) and, as famous, in hospitalizations20 (down 46%). Reports declare greater than 486,000 Americans have died from COVID as of February 16, 2021.21
However, none of these numbers is dependable. In addition to inaccurate PCR outcomes, a spread of different measures have skewed the reported quantity of deaths from COVID. While CDC electronically codes different causes of loss of life, it has chosen handy code each COVID loss of life,22 and explains:
“It takes extra time to code COVID-19 deaths. While 80% of deaths are electronically processed and coded by NCHS within minutes, most deaths from COVID-19 must be coded by a person, which takes an average of 7 days.”
CDC Treating COVID Deaths Differently
I’m ready for CDC to reply my Freedom of Information Act question, which requested the protocol CDC’s coders use for coding COVID-19 as a trigger of loss of life. Why is CDC treating COVID deaths in another way from deaths on account of different circumstances?
CDC modified the best way it coded loss of life certificates for a COVID-caused loss of life in March 2020, to incorporate everybody for whom COVID is in any approach contributory to the loss of life. By putting completely different elements of the directions about coding on completely different internet pages, CDC efficiently hid what it was doing.
On one web page, the steering23 states, “If COVID-19 is determined to be a cause of death, it should be reported on the death certificate.” On a distinct webpage, CDC states: “When COVID-19 is reported as a cause of death on the death certificate, it is coded and counted as a death due to COVID-19.”24
CDC has inspired suppliers to be beneficiant with COVID designations.25 And the COVID loss of life definition seems to be a shifting goal,26 variable throughout states. CDC makes an attempt to elucidate27 why its mortality numbers don’t add up, and contains this excuse: “Other reporting systems use different definitions or methods for counting deaths.” But it’s CDC that selected to not subject uniform tips.
COVID Diagnosis Liberally Applied
|
Anyone with a optimistic COVID take a look at who dies inside 30 days of the take a look at is counted as a loss of life on account of COVID, even when COVID shouldn’t be talked about on the loss of life certificates in Nevada.28 Colorado coroners are being pressured to checklist gunshot wound deaths as due to COVID29,30 if the sufferer had a optimistic latest take a look at. Oregon’s well being company reported in August 2020:31
|
|
CDC guesstimates that many deaths, maybe half, which checklist generic pneumonia because the trigger of loss of life are literally COVID deaths, and redesignates them as COVID-caused deaths. |
|
CDC created a brand new statistical class for deaths, titled “Pneumonia, Influenza and COVID-19,” or PIC,32,33 to facilitate this redesignation. |
|
CDC admitted:34
 |
|
CDC applies a number of statistical methods to cope with anomalous knowledge earlier than publishing its trigger of loss of life outcomes. The uncooked loss of life knowledge should not made obtainable to the general public. |
|
If COVID is listed as one contributor to a loss of life on the loss of life certificates, even when the loss of life is brought on by most cancers or coronary heart assault, CDC relabels it a loss of life brought on by COVID. |
|
Because hospitals are paid a number of occasions extra by Medicare for sufferers who’ve been given a COVID prognosis, and a optimistic COVID take a look at shouldn’t be required, it’s assumed that the prognosis of COVID is utilized liberally in hospitalized sufferers. |
|
By altering the strategies by which it performs its calculations, CDC has made it not possible to match prior 12 months statistics with the interval for the reason that onset of COVID. |
|
Physician and former Minnesota state legislator Scott Jensen described an audit35 of loss of life certificates attributed to COVID in Minnesota. The loss of life certificates itemizing COVID because the underlying trigger of loss of life totaled 2,715, however the deaths attributed to COVID included an additional 878 deaths, a 32% improve. |
The Public Is within the Dark
By accepting excessive cycle thresholds for COVID PCR tests, CDC significantly expanded the numbers of COVID-positive instances, hospitalizations and deaths. By utilizing a spread of idiosyncratic and altering statistical measures, CDC was in a position to management and additional improve the quantity of deaths attributed to COVID-19.
I don’t imply to indicate that the PCR exams, whose producers could have not too long ago lowered their cycle thresholds, at the moment are correct. Over 200 completely different PCR exams have been “authorized” below emergency guidelines36 by the FDA, which up to now has not standardized or formally permitted them.
The public is at midnight as as to whether and the way every particular person take a look at could have modified in response to WHO’s instruction, and we stay uninformed in regards to the accuracy of every take a look at. In reality, it has been established37 by the American College of Pathology that COVID-19 PCR take a look at outcomes should not reproducible.
By hand-coding every loss of life on account of COVID, CDC gave itself the ability to find out what number of COVID deaths can be counted at any specific time. And by creating excessively free case definitions38 for COVID, a number of of which didn’t require a single signal of sickness, only a optimistic take a look at, CDC was in a position to calibrate the quantity of COVID-positive instances by the speed at which it rolled out exams to the nation.
Today, the media are telling us to rejoice. Maryland has simply gotten its share of optimistic COVID exams beneath 5%,39 when a month in the past the speed was 8.76%. In my state of Maine, a discount within the share of take a look at outcomes which can be optimistic has turned all counties “green,” permitting colleges to be open.40 How a lot of this is because of dialing down the cycle thresholds?
We Are Being Lied Into the Abyss
Things are worse, issues are higher. Wear no masks41 — no, put on a masks — hey, put on two masks.42 New variants with much more infectivity are coming! But they’re no extra deadly, and SARS-CoV-2 is sort of infectious already, so will the brand new strains make an considerable distinction?
It appears that regardless of having recovered from COVID, you will be reinfected with the brand new viral strains. But how frequent is that? Does it merely imply you’ll be able to have a optimistic PCR take a look at, however be in any other case asymptomatic? I discovered solely a single case report43 of an individual turning into severely unwell from a brand new pressure after having recovered from authentic COVID.
- The level is to maintain us begging for the most recent vaccine as quickly as we have now obtained the final, however no-longer-effective, vaccine.
- The level is to maintain arising with narratives to justify locking us up and lowering productiveness.
- The level is to maintain us frightened and confused and unable to make use of our wits.
- The level is to cease us wanting deeply and clearly into what is going on, whereas the media blares COVID hysteria nonstop.
Our households are being torn aside. Our small companies are going bankrupt. Our nations, and doubtless we ourselves, are being scooped up by the banks, as borrowing on an unheard-of scale persists at a dizzying tempo. Who pays these money owed? What would be the worth? Can you see that the looting and crashing of our economies is intentional, buttressed by lie after lie?
We are being lied into the abyss. Our so-called leaders are tossing us and particularly our kids and grandchildren over a cliff. They threw away our Constitution way back. Now, they’ve stolen and bought our future.
Please settle down. Turn off all of the “news” and ponder what has been taking place. We can repair this mess, as soon as sufficient of us perceive it. Give it the time and focus it deserves. Our leaders will not save us. Only WE can.
Source Link – articles.mercola.com
source https://infomagzine.com/shameless-manipulation-of-positive-pcr-tests/
No comments:
Post a Comment